Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13500 is 1973 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 52% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 504 vs 332 FPS
- Up to 65% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $199.99 vs $576.53
- Up to 77% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.4 vs $1.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13500 - 32 vs 20 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
504
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $199.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
332
65%
Value, $/FPS
$1.74/FPS
22%
Price, $
$576.53
34%
Buy for $576.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |