Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Core i3-7300T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2192 days newer than Core i3-7300T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-7300T - 143 vs 133 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300T - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
143
100%
Value, $/FPS
$6.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$899.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | Intel Core i3-7300T |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |