Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1973 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 11% better in Overwatch 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 383 vs 344 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $819.3 vs $899.99
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 32 vs 16 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73887 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
344
89.81723237597912%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$819.3
100%
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73889 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1171
51.1353711790393%
Multi-Core
7539
70.1628664495114%
Intel Core i5-13400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 16 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |