Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12500 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12500 is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12500
- Performs up to 9% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 233 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - $189.99 vs $250.0
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12500 - 24 vs 12 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $189.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74362 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
213
91.41630901287554%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$250
75%
Buy for $250 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74363 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
50.80051925573345%
Multi-Core
6976
76.8366560193854%
Intel Core i5-12500 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |