Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 2675 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 57% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 472 vs 301 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400 - 16 vs 12 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
472
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$161.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $161.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4914 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 730 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |