Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2977 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 17% better in F1 22 than Celeron 1007U - 286 vs 245 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 17 vs 125 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
286
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.63/FPS
100%
Price, $
$179.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | Intel Celeron 1007U |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 20th, 2013 |
Core i5 | Collection | Celeron |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel BGA 1023 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 17 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 15.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |