Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700KF outperforms Celeron 1007U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700KF is 2657 days newer than Celeron 1007U.
Advantages of Intel Celeron 1007U
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700KF - 17 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700KF
- Performs up to 41% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron 1007U - 595 vs 421 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron 1007U - 16 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
595
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Price, $
$217.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $217.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10303 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 20th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron 1007U | vs | Intel Core i7-10700KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 20th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |