Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1314 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 14% better in Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 231 vs 203 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $175.0 vs $819.3
- Up to 81% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.76 vs $4.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 32 vs 12 threads
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
231
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$175
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2313 minutes ago
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2314 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |