Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600 is 477 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 449 vs 427 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $140.0 vs $1240.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - $0.31 vs $2.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600 - 48 vs 12 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
449
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Price, $
$140
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $140 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 159 minutes ago
Buy for $1,240 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11600 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 48 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |