Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms Xeon E3-1280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 3635 days newer than Xeon E3-1280.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 13% better in Elden Ring than Xeon E3-1280 - 128 vs 113 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 - 12 vs 8 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.91/FPS
100%
Price, $
$115.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $115.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 146 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Xeon E3-1280 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2011 |
Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E3 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |