Buy on Amazon
$124
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10600KF is 68 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 9 3900XT.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600KF
- Up to 72% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $124.0 vs $450.0
- Up to 72% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Ryzen 9 3900XT - $0.76 vs $2.74 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 105 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$124
100%
Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-10600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.8 GHz Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA 1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 125W
Buy for $124 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-Threads Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for $450 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-10600KF
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
