Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240T.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 94% better in FIFA 23 than Core i3-3240T - 180 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-10600K - $25.7 vs $143.7
- Up to 65% better value when playing FIFA 23 than Core i5-10600K - $0.28 vs $0.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16849 minutes ago
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16848 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10600K | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |