Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms Core i5-10300H on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 72 days older than Core i5-10300H.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10300H
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 6% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-10300H - 368 vs 347 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10300H - 24 vs 8 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
368
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$399
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2530 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Sep 17th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-10300H | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 17th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |