Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6800K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6800K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 952 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6800K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Minecraft than Core i7-6800K - 718 vs 683 FPS
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 91 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Up to 48% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - $103.0 vs $198.94
- Up to 46% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i3-9350KF - $0.15 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 12 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
718
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
53%
Price, $
$198.94
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13486 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
683
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$103
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $103 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13487 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Broadwell-E |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |