Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 180 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 5% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 5 3400G - 177 vs 169 FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3400G
- Up to 51% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - $98.15 vs $198.94
- Up to 48% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-9350KF - $0.58 vs $1.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9350KF doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
177
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.12/FPS
51%
Price, $
$198.94
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for $198.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
169
95%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9350KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 3400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |