Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 1586 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100T
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $99.0 vs $542.43
- Up to 79% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-13900 - $0.83 vs $3.99 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 14% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-9100T - 136 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100T - 32 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
119
87.5%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2410 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3.99/FPS
20.80200501253133%
Price, $
$542.43
18%
FPS Winner
Buy for $542.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2415 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Single-Core
1203
44.32571849668386%
Multi-Core
3178
19.347376111043467%
Intel Core i3-9100T | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |