Buy on Amazon
$115
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $122
Availability
MSRP in USD: $122
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $5489
Availability
MSRP in USD: $5489
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 448 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 8% better in Minecraft than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 704 vs 651 FPS
- Up to 92% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $115.0 vs $1499.0
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 128 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W
Buy for $115 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77180 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
651
92.4715909090909%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1499
7%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX 64-core, 128-thread desktop processor
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1374
85.98247809762202%
Multi-Core
3669
24.743728082007014%
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 64 |
| 4 | Threads | 128 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
