Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 448 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $56.99 vs $897.22
- Up to 93% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - $0.33 vs $4.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 65 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 4% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-9100F - 181 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
174
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13926 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
181
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.96/FPS
6%
Price, $
$897.22
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for $897.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13926 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |