Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-4765T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100 is 1917 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-4765T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4765T - 131 vs 122 FPS
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-4765T - $121.0 vs $498.95
- Up to 78% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-4765T - $0.92 vs $4.09 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-4765T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
FPS
131
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, $
$121
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $121 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for $498.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100 | vs | Intel Core i7-4765T |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |