Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8350K outperforms Xeon E5-2667 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8350K is 1123 days newer than Xeon E5-2667 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8350K
- Performs up to 14% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 198 vs 174 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 91 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-8350K
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8350K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
91 W | TDP | 135 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
