Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i3-8100T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 1302 days older than Core i3-8100T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100T
- Consumes up to 59% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 35 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-8100T - 174 vs 172 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-8100T - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-8100T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Xeon E5-2630 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-8100T | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 85 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
