Key Differences
In short — Core i3-8100 outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-8100 is 1253 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-8100
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1840 - 184 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than Intel Core i3-8100 - 53 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Price, $
$135
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $135 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3717 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
40.562248995983936%
Multi-Core
854
25.080763582966227%
Intel Core i3-8100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1840 |
---|---|---|
Oct 5th, 2017 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |