Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7350K outperforms the more expensive FX-8300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7350K is 1533 days newer than the more expensive FX-8300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Performs up to 5% better in Dead Space than FX-8300 - 152 vs 145 FPS
- Up to 54% cheaper than FX-8300 - $51.6 vs $112.02
- Up to 56% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-8300 - $0.34 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than AMD FX-8300 - 60 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
152
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1954 minutes ago
Buy for $112.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1955 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7350K | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
42.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |