Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7300 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7300 and the more expensive Core i7-7700T have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than Core i7-7700T - 199 vs 198 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $129.0 vs $150.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing Valheim than Core i7-7700T - $0.65 vs $0.75 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7300 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
199
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |