Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i7-10700 - $98.55 vs $234.98
- Up to 53% better value when playing F1 23 than Core i7-10700 - $0.47 vs $1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700
- Performs up to 11% better in F1 23 than Core i3-7300 - 233 vs 209 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
209
89%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
233
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.01/FPS
46%
Price, $
$234.98
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for $234.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |