Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7300 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7300 is 637 days older than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7300
- Performs up to 1% better in Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 138 vs 137 FPS
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $129.0 vs $1150.0
- Up to 89% better value when playing Far Cry 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.93 vs $8.39 per FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 51 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7300 - 48 vs 4 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
138
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.93/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 37 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 48 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |