Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1710 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770K - 126 vs 119 FPS
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i7-3770K - $48.1 vs $175.0
- Up to 74% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-3770K - $0.38 vs $1.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770K - 35 vs 77 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770K
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100T - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
126
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$48.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $48.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for $175 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100T | vs | Intel Core i7-3770K |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 77 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |