Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100 is 490 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - 128 vs 127 FPS
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $70.0 vs $99.9
- Up to 30% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - $0.55 vs $0.79 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i3-7100 - 35 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
128
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$70
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |