Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4360 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 1632 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i9-9920X - $149.88 vs $587.46
- Up to 74% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-9920X - $1.26 vs $4.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 54 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 2% better in Elden Ring than Core i3-4360 - 121 vs 119 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 24 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
119
98%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
121
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.86/FPS
25%
Price, $
$587.46
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 165 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |