Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-10400F outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4360 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2191 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4360.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4360
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i5-10400F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4360 - 132 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i3-4360 - $99.95 vs $149.88
- Up to 35% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-4360 - $0.76 vs $1.17 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4360 - 12 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3774 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
132
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.76/FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3774 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4360 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |