Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4350.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4350
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11600KF - $51.6 vs $165.86
- Up to 66% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i5-11600KF - $0.18 vs $0.53 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 54 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-4350 - 313 vs 282 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4350 - 12 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2857 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
313
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
33%
Price, $
$165.86
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for $165.86 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2857 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4350 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |