Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2630 v3 outperforms Core i3-4330 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2630 v3 is 372 days newer than Core i3-4330.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4330
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 54 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4330 - 174 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4330 - 16 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4330 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 85 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |