Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6700 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-6700 is 345 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700
- Performs up to 5% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-4160T - 253 vs 240 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 8 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
FPS
253
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.51/FPS
100%
Price, $
$129
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $129 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8464 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jul 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | Intel Core i7-6700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |