Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 2700 outperforms Core i3-4160T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 2700 is 1368 days newer than Core i3-4160T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 2700 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 2700 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 2700
- Performs up to 2% better in Minecraft than Core i3-4160T - 670 vs 654 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160T - 16 vs 4 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
670
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4160T | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 2700 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |