Key Differences
In short — Core i3-7100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-7100 is 897 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $11.48 vs $39.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i3-7100 - $0.05 vs $0.16 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Performs up to 1% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-4160 - 223 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4160 - 51 vs 54 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
221
99.10313901345292%
Value, $/FPS
$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$11.48
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $11.48 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
31.25%
Price, $
$39.99
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
1064
85.32477947072975%
Multi-Core
2072
84.91803278688525%
Intel Core i3-4160 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |