Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-8600K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-8600K is 1253 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150T - 178 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $148.49 vs $219.95
- Up to 39% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i3-4150T - $0.83 vs $1.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 6 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8205 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, $
$148.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $148.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8206 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |