Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10320 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-4150T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-4150T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Core i3-4150T - 178 vs 164 FPS
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i3-4150T - $120.0 vs $219.95
- Up to 50% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i3-4150T - $0.67 vs $1.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150T - 8 vs 4 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $219.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8979 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
178
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.67/FPS
100%
Price, $
$120
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150T | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |