Buy on Amazon
$45
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $117
Availability
MSRP in USD: $117
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7740X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-7740X is 1152 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-7740X - $45.0 vs $189.0
- Up to 75% better value when playing Halo Infinite than Core i7-7740X - $0.29 vs $1.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 52% less energy than Intel Core i7-7740X - 54 vs 112 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7740X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7740X
- Performs up to 4% better in Halo Infinite than Core i3-4150 - 163 vs 157 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-4150 Processor (3M Cache, 3.50 GHz) BX80646I34150
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7458 minutes ago
Intel Core i7-7740X X-Series Processor 4 Cores up to 4.50GHz Turbo Unlocked FCLGA2066 X299 Series 112W
Buy for $189 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7458 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-4150
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Core i7-7740X
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i7-7740X |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 112 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
