Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 2511 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 75% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - $45.0 vs $179.99
- Up to 69% better value when playing Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i5-11600K - $0.24 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 54 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 23% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-4150 - 235 vs 191 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1875 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
235
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
31%
Price, $
$179.99
25%
FPS Winner
Buy for $179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1874 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |