Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600X is 1076 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 67% cheaper than Ryzen 5 1600X - $41.13 vs $125.0
- Up to 68% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 1600X - $0.25 vs $0.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4150 - 163 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
162
99%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 180 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4150 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |