Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3781 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $41.13 vs $529.99
- Up to 90% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i9-14900F - $0.26 vs $2.7 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 22% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-4130 - 196 vs 161 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 32 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
161
82%
Value, $/FPS
$0.26/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6498 minutes ago
Buy for $529.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |