Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i9-11900F - $41.13 vs $210.0
- Up to 79% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i9-11900F - $0.19 vs $0.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-11900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900F
- Performs up to 8% better in Death Stranding than Core i3-4130 - 237 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
220
92%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13169 minutes ago
Buy for $210 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13168 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |