Key Differences
In short — Core i7-11700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-11700F is 2753 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-11700F - $41.13 vs $260.91
- Up to 80% better value when playing Rust than Core i7-11700F - $0.23 vs $1.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i7-11700F - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-11700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-11700F
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Core i3-4130 - 227 vs 177 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
177
77%
Value, $/FPS
$0.23/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3704 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
227
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.15/FPS
20%
Price, $
$260.91
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $260.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3703 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | Intel Core i7-11700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |