Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4130 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4130 is 313 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than FX-6300 - 220 vs 213 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than FX-6300 - $41.13 vs $74.04
- Up to 46% better value when playing Death Stranding than FX-6300 - $0.19 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 54 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
220
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10138 minutes ago
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10137 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4130 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |