Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2600 outperforms Core i3-4010U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2600 is 1780 days newer than Core i3-4010U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2600 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 2600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Performs up to 9% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-4010U - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4010U - 12 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
127
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, $
$85.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $85.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4010U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Haswell | Codename | Pinnacle Ridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |