Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Core i3-370M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2844 days newer than Core i3-370M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 6% better in Minecraft than Core i3-370M - 619 vs 586 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-370M doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
619
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $23.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-370M | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |