Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3116 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 79% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $41.0 vs $197.59
- Up to 75% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i5-11500 - $0.18 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-11500 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 23% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-3240 - 278 vs 226 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
278
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
25%
Price, $
$197.59
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $197.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |