Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3785 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $41.0 vs $197.99
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.28 vs $1.21 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 13% better in Dead Space than Core i3-3240 - 164 vs 145 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 12 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
Buy for $197.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 106 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |