Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms Core i3-3227U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 1675 days newer than Core i3-3227U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3227U
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 17 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 29% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i3-3227U - 72 vs 56 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3227U - 32 vs 4 threads
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
72
100%
Value, $/FPS
$11.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$819.3
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $819.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5009 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3227U | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |