Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3676 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $80.0 vs $242.17
- Up to 57% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-13600KF - $0.68 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 30% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-3220T - 153 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 20 vs 4 threads
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3361 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
43%
Price, $
$242.17
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3361 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |